2021年11月27雅思大作文題目
Some people say it is the government responsibility to transport children to school. Others believe parents should transport their children to school. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
高分范文及解析
Introduction
It is not a rare case that accidents pop up occasionally and pose a threat to young children on their way to school. As a result, there is the argument over who should be responsible for guaranteeing children the safety.
解析
雙邊討論，誰應該送孩子上學。比較難以確定立場，需分兩種情況討論：家校距離遠 VS 家校距離近
pop up vi. 突然出現
pose a threat to sb./ sth. 對…構成威脅
guarantee sb. sth. 保證（常作褒義）
Body 1
Admittedly, government should, at least partially, be in charge of sending youngsters to school. This is mainly because young children are vulnerable members of society, and they may be confronted with unexpected accidents. In this case, it is imperative for government to assume its unescapable obligation by transporting young students to school. Besides, if government has a sufficient budget, it should provide such welfare services to its taxpayers, as those parents are very likely to be wrapped up in their work, with no more time allocated to giving their children a ride to school. // However, offering totally free transport may seriously strain public finances, forcing the government to make serious cuts to its expenditure in other crucial domains such as healthcare, public infrastructure, poverty elimination, and environment protection.
解析
贊同是政府責任的理由：1. 有義務保護未成年人；2. 有預算的情況下，為其納稅人（家長）提供便利 [這邊“有預算”的前提，為下文做鋪墊]// 反對理由：校車不是政府必須開銷，預算吃緊的情況下應優(yōu)先考慮其他領域需求，比如：醫(yī)療、基礎教育、基礎設施、脫貧、環(huán)境保護等
vulnerable adj. 易受到傷害的
be confronted with 遭遇到
assume vt. 承擔
taxpayer n. 納稅人
be wrapped up in把全部精力放在某事上〔以至于沒有時間關心別的事〕
strain vt. 使不堪承受
make cuts to sth. 〔規(guī)�；驍盗�，尤指政府或公司支出的〕削減，縮減，裁減
elimination n. 消除，根除
Body 2
Acting as the legal guardians of young children, parents undoubtedly ought to take the responsibility to ensure the safety of their kids. In addition, if there is a short distance between the home and the school, it is even more inconvenient for students to take the school bus, as their residences are not always on a school bus route. Driving children to school by parents can instead save much time. // However, it is not always the case, since there are either instances where parents fail to coordinate the time of transporting their children and going to work on time due to the long travelling distance, or instances where impoverished families cannot afford private cars to drive their children to school.
解析
贊同家長接送的理由：1. 作為孩子監(jiān)護人，理應為孩子安全負責；2. 距離近的情況下，校車的固定線路反而不便利 [這里“距離近”的前提為下文做鋪墊] // 反對家長接送理由：特殊情況下，比如家校距離遠、低收入家庭沒有條件等，家長無法協調時間或金錢接送孩子
guardian n. 監(jiān)護人
residence n.[C] 住宅
on a …. route 在…的線路上
impoverished adj. 窮困的
04
In conclusion, government and parents should be jointly responsible for transferring children to school. If there is a short distance, then it is advised for parents to take such responsibility. If the travelling distance is rather long, then parents ought to send their children to the nearest school bus station punctually, and it is legitimate for government to charge parents a reasonable fee. Meanwhile, low-income families should be taken into consideration, and government has to guarantee children from these families free access to school buses.
解析
情況擺明自己立場：距離近，家長接送；距離遠，家長準時將孩子送到附近校車站（這也是目前現實中常見的解決辦法）
jointly adv. 共同地；聯合地
punctually adv. 準時地
legitimate adj. 合情合理的
本文由培訓無憂網廣州新東方專屬課程顧問老師整理發(fā)布，更多相關課程請關注培訓無憂網雅思培訓或添加老師微信：15033336050
以上文章由廣州新東方教育課程顧問整理編輯發(fā)布，部分文章來自網絡內容真實性請自行核實或聯系我們，了解相關專業(yè)課程信息您可在線咨詢也可免費申請試課。關注官方微信了解更多：150 3333 6050
免 費 申 請 試 課
